Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About Genetic Selection


Genetic selection procedures are done either on fetuses, through prenatal screening, or on embryos that are outside a woman’s body, through Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD).

PGD tests embryos for the presence of genetic sequences linked to a variety of conditions and characteristics. A cell is extracted from an embryo at its eight-cell stage and analyzed. Embryos with the selected characteristics can be implanted in a woman's uterus to develop into a child. The procedure does not appear to affect embryos’ or fetuses’ subsequent development, though more follow-up studies of children born after PGD are needed.


Frequently Asked Questions

Arguments Pro & Con

PGD was developed to allow couples at risk of passing on a serious genetic disease to have children not affected by it. Since its introduction in 1990, it has been most widely used to prevent the birth of children with conditions such as Down's syndrome, Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell, Huntington's chorea, and Cooley's anemia.

However, PGD is increasingly being used for other reasons. These include social sex selection, creating “savior siblings” who can provide bone marrow or other transplant tissues to sick older siblings, and selecting against embryos with genes correlated with late-onset and non-fatal conditions. Some clinics have even offered the technique for purely cosmetic traits including eye color, hair color, and skin complexion.

A newer variation of PGD, called Preimplantation Genetic Haplotyping, allows for many more genes to be tested, and for greater accuracy.

Many disability rights advocates, in particular, have been critical of PGD and prenatal screening. They point out that the definition of "disease" is to some extent subjective. Most support women’s right to decide whether or not to have a child at a given time, but are critical of basing this decision on the traits of the particular embryo or fetus.



The Great Gene Hunt (cont'd)by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesSeptember 3rd, 2010Accurate reporting and headlines should not be noteworthy, but when it comes to genetics they are -- and Reuters got one right.
Oh, No, It's a Girl! South Asians Flock to Sex-Selection Clinics in U.S.[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Viji SundaramNew America MediaAugust 31st, 2010For those with roots in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, sex selection is often not freely chosen.
Top IVF doctor defends offering help for parents to pick babies' sexby Lisa AdamsDaily RecordJuly 29th, 2010MEET the doctor who is making Scots' dreams of designing the perfect baby come true.
Conservation and Eugenics: The environmental movement's dirty secret[Commentary]by Charles WohlforthOrion MagazineOrion Magazine, whose mission is "serious thinking on the deeper connection between the environment and social and political issues," has published a thoughtful essay tracing the roots of environmentalism back to a very unpleasant historical truth.
Sometimes Beautiful People Do Unattractive Thingsby Osagie Obasogie Biopolitical TimesJune 23rd, 2010Beautifulpeople.com is taking the designer gamete market to a whole new level by using its online dating service as a vehicle for people to find sperm from attractive donors so that they can presumably have beautiful children.
Dating Site Creates Online Sperm and Egg Bankby Jessica RamirezNewsweekJune 21st, 2010Who doesn’t love a pretty baby? According to one company, the better question might be who doesn’t want one?
Caveat Emptor, Caveat Spittor by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 14th, 2010Direct-to-consumer genetic tests are bad medicine. And what of their societal implications?
A Real-Life Version of “My Sister’s Keeper”by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 6th, 2010"The Match" is an emotionally compelling and thought-provoking account of a family's decision to create a genetically matched baby to treat their sick daughter.
3-Parent Embryos Could Prevent Disease, But Raise Ethical Issues [Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Brandon KeimWired ScienceApril 14th, 2010Mitochondrial swapping might seem less controversial than regular genetic engineering, because it involves metabolism rather than obvious physical traits. "On the other hand, when embryo manipulations for heritable changes start being done, even with the best intentions, we're on slippery ground," said Darnovsky.
Gene testing spurs decline of some dire diseasesby Marilynn MarchioneAssociated PressFebruary 19th, 2010Some inherited diseases appear to be declining, and a few have nearly disappeared, because more people are using genetic testing to decide whether to have children.
Eugenics fear as British couples are offered £700 online gene test for 100 inherited diseasesby Fiona MacRaeThe Daily MailFebruary 9th, 2010Experts warned that a simple test to stop couples from passing on genetic diseases to their children was unnecessary and could lead to 'back door eugenics'.
Whither Personal Genomics?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJanuary 29th, 2010Three companies offer contrasting examples of where the fledgling industry goes from here.
Embryos destroyed for "minor" disordersby Lois RogersThe TelegraphJanuary 24th, 2010UK fertility regulators are allowing doctors to screen out embryos that could lead full lives despite having a genetic condition.
Nudging the Discourse?by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJanuary 8th, 2010The Popular Mechanics article misleadingly titled "How to Create a Designer Baby" includes a call for regulation of assisted reproduction.
Demand for 'designer babies' to grow dramaticallyby Mark HendersonThe TimesJanuary 7th, 2010Parental demand for “designer babies” screened to lack faulty genes will grow dramatically over the next decade, a leading geneticist has predicted.
IVF websites often mum on embryo gene test risksby Anne HardingReutersOctober 14th, 2009Fertility clinic websites aren't doing a great job of explaining the risks of genetically testing an embryo before it's implanted in the womb, researchers found.
GATTACA Comes to Baseballby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJuly 24th, 2009Major League Baseball has been using DNA tests on prospects from the Dominican Republic.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis May Pose Neurological RisksMedical News TodayJuly 23rd, 2009A new long-term analysis of PGD in mice suggests that it may increase risks of weight gain and memory decline in adulthood.
Other uses for laboratory-produced sperm?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 13th, 2009Advances in laboratory-produced sperm--if perfected--could also be used for other purposes, including troubling ones.
Healthy Embryos Show Chromosome Flawsby Nora SchultzTechnology ReviewJuly 8th, 2009A study involving higher-resolution genetic screening suggests that PGD often falsely identifies early embryos as unhealthy.
Genetic 'MoT' for disease free babiesby Kate DevlinThe TelegraphJune 30th, 2009A genetic test which can help IVF couples screen embryos for hereditary diseases and have healthy babies could be available within a year.
Pro-choice questions about abortion for sex selection and disabilityby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesJune 24th, 2009Former Catholics for Choice president Frances Kissling urges pro-choicers to confront tough issues.
Eugenics and Genetic Screeningby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMay 20th, 2009A new report raises the specter of eugenics from a libertarian perspective.
Scientific American on Regulating Designer-baby Technologies by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 8th, 2009The editors of one of the most prestigious American popular science magazines call for greater oversight of the baby business.
The Need to Regulate "Designer Babies"[Editorial]Scientific AmericanApril 30th, 2009Scientific American magazine argues that more oversight is needed to prevent misuse of new reproductive technologies.
Answering Questions With Questionsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesApril 23rd, 2009The future of genomics is now the subject of serious debate, with enormous implications for genomic medicine.
Parents 'refused genetic tests'by Clare MurphyBBC NewsApril 22nd, 2009Children are being born with severe genetic abnormalities because their parents are being refused funding to screen their embryos, those working in the field have claimed.
Countries with laws or policies on sex selection [PDF]by Marcy DarnovskyApril 16th, 2009This memo contains a chart showing the 37 countries that have adopted national policies on sex selection, and excerpts from six countries' policies.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill 2008A Commentaryby David KingApril 15th, 2009The director of Human Genetics Alert offers an analysis of the UK's new law governing human genetic and reproductive technologies.
Voluntary isn't workingRecent events show need for regulation of assisted reproductionby Marcy DarnovskyModern HealthcareApril 13th, 2009Responsible regulation and oversight will protect fertility patients and bolster public trust in the enterprise of assisted reproduction.
23andMe Targets Mommies-to-Beby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesApril 1st, 2009The personal genomics company's new target is pregnant women. Are early-stage fetuses next?
Genetic embryo screening: Questions grow along with number of proceduresby Laurie GoeringChicago TribuneMarch 25th, 2009Figuring out the ethical and regulatory guidelines for checking embryos for genetic conditions is proving difficult.
Preventing the Next Fertility Clinic Scandalby Jesse ReynoldsBioethics ForumMarch 13th, 2009What was remarkable about the reaction to two recent IVF controversies was the chorus of agreement that it’s time to leave the "Wild West" days of assisted reproduction behind.
Osagie Obasogie on the Jeff Farias Show [MP3 audio]by Jeff FariasThe Jeff Farias ShowMarch 10th, 2009A discussion about race and human biotechnology on a talk radio program
Designer Babies [MP3 audio][Features CGS's Osagie Obasogie]by Michael KrasnyKQED ForumMarch 10th, 2009Is there a legal and ethical infrastructure in place to govern 'designer babies'?
Designer Baby’ Offer to Screen Embryos For Eye, Hair, Skin Pigmentation Dropped[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Joyce E. CutlerThe Bureau of National AffairsMarch 4th, 2009A fertility clinic in California has withdrawn its plan to offer prospective parents so-called designer babies through genetic screening of embryos for eye and hair color and skin pigmentation.
Forget Designer Baby Bags—Now There’s Designer Babies[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Madeline EllisHealth NewsMarch 4th, 2009Questions of the limits of reproductive technology were raised after the a fertility clinic announced plans to allow prospective parents to choose the gender, eye, hair, skin color, and other physical traits of their babies.
Fertility doc backs off on custom kidsUnited Press InternationalMarch 4th, 2009A fertility doctor says he will be limiting his genetics work to dodging diseases rather than customizing physical traits such as hair and eye color.
Public interest group responds to postponement of "designer baby" serviceCenter for Genetics and Society calls for federal oversight, hearingsMarch 4th, 2009"We are encouraged by the near unanimous condemnation of an offer to use an embryo screening technique to select the hair color, eye color, and complexion of future children."
Custom order babies [Video][Features CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]CNN Headline NewsMarch 3rd, 2009The news network interviews CGS's associate executive director regarding a fertility clinic's offer to select for a baby's cosmetic traits.
PGD for hair color, eye color, and skin complexion [Video][Features CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]Fox News ChannelMarch 3rd, 2009The Fox News Channel interviews CGS's associate executive director in this segment on "designer babies."
California fertility doctor’s offer of trait selection stirs ethical questions[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Laura BauerKansas City StarMarch 3rd, 2009Hype or help, the medical ethics community and other fertility specialists are aghast at this brave new world.
Public interest group calls for Congressional hearings on fertility industryIn wake of octuplets and “designer babies” controversies, Center for Genetics and Society says oversight is overdueMarch 3rd, 2009"For too long, America has had an unfortunate reputation as the 'Wild West' of the fertility industry – and that image has been reinforced by recent controversies."
Special deliveries: Are designer babies arriving? [With video][Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Mike CelizicThe TODAY ShowMarch 3rd, 2009The news that a California fertility clinic is offering prospective parents the opportunity to improve the odds of having children with preselected hair, skin and eye color has renewed the debate over “designer babies.”
Bioethicist and industry spokesman on the baby businessby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMarch 3rd, 2009Bioethicist Art Caplan cites profit and eugenics, and calls for regulation. The ASRM's Sean Tipton cites parental choice.
Designer baby row over US clinicBBC NewsMarch 2nd, 2009A US clinic has sparked controversy by offering would-be parents the chance to select traits like the eye and hair colour of their offspring.
Designer baby row over clinic that offers eye, skin and hair colour[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Philip SherwellThe TelegraphFebruary 28th, 2009A Los Angeles clinic is offering the ultimate in designer babies. Want a son with brown eyes, black hair and a dark complexion? Or a pale-skinned, blonde, green-eyed daughter?
"Racial alchemy" - for real?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 26th, 2009Until now, hypothetical discussions of embryo screening for eye and skin color have seemed distant.
New Safety, New Concerns In Tests for Down Syndromeby Rob SteinWashington PostFebruary 24th, 2009"We have a history in this country of a eugenics movement where people tried to eliminate certain people from the gene pool. People could start wondering, 'How did you get born?'"
Select a baby's health, not eye color[Commentary]by Allen GoldbergLos Angeles Times February 17th, 2009Clinics offering to create designer babies may turn people against a procedure that can save lives.
Color ID: Screening embryos for eye, hair, and skin color[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by William SaletanSlateFebruary 17th, 2009Trait selection is being offered by a Los Angeles fertility clinic. Is this another assisted reproduction service we'll get used to?
Custom-Designed Kids: How Darwin's Legacy Is Being Abusedby Jesse ReynoldsAlterNetFebruary 12th, 2009Two contentious conversations about genes and society continue to haunt America.
A Baby, Please. Blond, Freckles -- Hold the Colic[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Gautam NaikWall Street JournalFebruary 12th, 2009Laboratory Techniques That Screen for Diseases in Embryos Are Now Being Offered to Create Designer Children
Unnatural selection: How far will parents go?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Marlowe HoodAgence France-PresseFebruary 8th, 2009Will genetic selection alter the evolutionary path of humans?
Clinic lets parents choose baby's complexionby Danny RoseAustralian Associated PressFebruary 1st, 2009Australians are visiting a US fertility clinic that allows them to choose not only the sex of their child, but features such as hair color, eye color, and complexion.
Fetal DNA Test Sheds Light, But Stirs an Ethical Battleby Todd AckermanHouston ChronicleDecember 21st, 2008Baylor College of Medicine is at the forefront of new DNA testing that screens fetuses for hundreds of genetic abnormalities — testing touted for diagnosing previously undetectable disorders but sparking debate because it's sure to result in more abortions.
Baby Selected To Be Free From Breast Cancer Geneby Kate DevlinTelegraphDecember 19th, 2008The first baby in Britain genetically screened to be free from a potentially deadly breast cancer gene will be born next week.
Known Unknownsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesDecember 2nd, 2008As more anomalies are reported, it seems that we know less and less about more and more -- and scientifically, this is a good thing.
Picking the Best Babyby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 2nd, 2008With the price of genetic sequencing plummeting, technologies enabling prospective parents and clinicians to pick the genetically "best" potential child may become feasible.
Prenatal Test Has Promise, Study Shows by Gautum NaikWall Street JournalNovember 29th, 2008Scientists are designing noninvasive tests that can tell whether a fetus suffers from inherited disorders
Gene testing of embryos needs guidingExperts caution against use of tests for adult-onset disordersby Erika Check HaydenNatureNovember 19th, 2008The prospect of using the technologies sold by personal-genomics companies to choose the genetic make-up of their children raises controversy
Last Second Shotby Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesNovember 17th, 2008ESPN recently ran a web feature story and televised segment (see below) on NBA All- Star forward Carlos Boozer and his son’s struggle with sickle cell anemia.
Sarah Palin, Down syndrome, and the abortion debateby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesNovember 7th, 2008Two commentaries explain how we can – and should – take prenatal genetic selection out of the abortion debate.
Designer babies: Creating the perfect child[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by Mike SteereCNNOctober 30th, 2008The Center for Genetics and Society is trying to encourage debate on the topic of genetic selection as soon as possible. Executive director of the organization, Richard Hayes, told CNN that in most countries, the public is missing out on taking part in the debate.
Fresh Hopes and Concerns as Fetal DNA Tests Advance by Rob SteinWashington PostOctober 26th, 2008Powerful new DNA tests screen fetuses for a wider range of genetic abnormalities. They have triggered complaints that they mark another step toward a society that seeks to weed out aberrations in the quest for the perfect child.
Finding the Faulty Gene: Embryology Test That Could Kill Off Inherited Illnessesby Mark HendersonThe TimesOctober 24th, 2008With a fresh approach, known as karyomapping, doctors will be able to offer preimplantation genetic diagnosis to couples affected even by very rare conditions, on a much faster timescale than is possible at present.
The Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act [PDF]October 16th, 2008The Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act, co-sponsored by Senators Kennedy and Brownback and signed into law in October 2008, is a positive step toward providing better information and support to pregnant women and new mothers whose fetus or newborn is diagnosed with a disability. This information sheet highlights the Act’s benefits and identifies some of the issues to monitor in its implementation.
Experts Fear Potential Abuses of Genetic Screening[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Beth WhitehouseNewsdayJuly 18th, 2008Will parents use embryo selection technology to select a child's characteristics the way you can pick the options on a car?
Kiwis consider sex selectionby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 20th, 2008The New Zealand Bioethics Council recommended allowing prospective parents to use sex selection through PGD for family balancing.
Is Sex Necessary for Reproduction?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Bernadette TanseySan Francisco ChronicleJune 1st, 2008The in vitro fertilization industry, which originated in the 1980s as a solution for infertile couples, has actively sought to expand its market scope by tapping social trends and collaborating with researchers in genetics and stem cell technology.
Dutch Cabinet Crisis Averted... For NowJust a storm in a test tube?by RNW's Dutch serviceRadio Netherlands WorldwideMay 31st, 2008Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende's fourth cabinet has narrowly avoided its first internal crisis caused by the domestic practice of carrying out tests for certain genetic defects on embryos during IVF treatment.
MPs Reject 'Saviour Sibling' BanBBC NewsMay 23rd, 2008A bid to stop parents having "saviour siblings" - babies selected to provide genetic material for seriously ill relatives - has been defeated by the United Kingdom Parliament.
Robert Winston on the UK's fertility billby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 13th, 2008Assisted reproduction pioneer Lord Robert Winston had some surprising words about the UK's controversial bill to overhaul its oversight of the reproduction industry and stem cell research.
Embryo research: a source of hope or horror?by Roger HighfieldThe Telegraph (UK)May 9th, 2008As the United Kingdom Parliament prepares to debate a Bill revising the law on embryo research, Telegraph Science Editor Roger Highfield examines the complex issues at stake.
Sex selection: On sale hereby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesApril 24th, 2008A discount offer - on an ethically sketchy and unnecessary invasive procedure.
Couples Could Win Right to Select Deaf Babyby Richard GrayTelegraphApril 14th, 2008Deaf couples could be allowed to use embryo-screening technology and choose to have a deaf child, after an amendment to a controversial bill to overhaul the UK's oversight of ARTs.
Is it wrong to select a deaf embryo?by Clare MurphyBBC NewsMarch 10th, 2008New fertility legislation will make it illegal to use embryos with a known genetic abnormality in IVF treatment when ones without the same defect are available.
Deaf demand right to designer deaf childrenby Sarah-Kate TempletonThe Times (UK)December 23rd, 2007Deaf parents should be allowed to screen their embryos so they can pick a deaf child over one that has all its senses intact, according to the chief executive of the Royal National Institute for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People.
Watson as wake-up call: When genetics endorses a new eugenicsby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesOctober 22nd, 2007Though neither media nor blogosphere have noted it so far, Watson and a small but disturbing number of other prominent figures are actively promoting a renewed program of eugenics - this time using 21st-century reproductive and genetic technologies.
Birth Without the Bother?by Nicholas D. KristofNew York TimesJuly 23rd, 2007"So where do we regulate and draw the line? My vote is to allow genetic technologies aimed at combating disease or infertility, but to bar any effort that goes beyond the curative to enhance the germ line DNA of our offspring."
Genetic Disorderby Dana GoldsteinIn These TimesJuly 6th, 2007National health policy has not kept up with genetic science, and many Americans lack the information they need to make an informed decision about whether to carry a pregnancy to term.
Genetic Testing + Abortion = ???by Amy HarmonNew York TimesMay 13th, 2007As prenatal tests make it possible to identify fetuses that will have mental retardation, deafness, and a range of other conditions, such personal deliberations are adding a new layer to the fraught political debate over abortion.
UK's HFEA Lowers the Bar, Againby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesApril 30th, 2007The Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority - Britain's regulatory body for reproductive and genetic technologies - has just given the green light for IVF embryos to be screened for the "breast cancer genes." But besides this lowering of the bar in expanding PGD's use, this also highlights two roles played by government in promoting what some call a "new eugenics."
Embryos to be screened for breast cancer geneUK Daily MailApril 27th, 2007Two women are set to become the first to have their embryos screened for the faulty breast cancer gene to prevent their children from contracting the disease.
Choosing Babiesby Emily SingerMIT Technology ReviewMarch 13th, 2007A growing number of genetic tests can be performed during in vitro fertilization, before pregnancy even begins. Is that a good thing?
Gene Shopping: Parents Won't Pass on Deadly Diseases with New ProcedureABC NewsMarch 9th, 2007But a new advance in genetics and reproductive medicine called preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, which uses in vitro fertilization has allowed the Kingsburys to bring Chloe into the world with no fear of getting the disease.
Dawn of the GM babies? [UK]thisislondon.co.ukFebruary 24th, 2007Scientists will be able to carry out genetic experiments on human embryos for the first time under controversial UK Government plans.
$40,000 for their designer daughterby Peta HellardHerald SunFebruary 14th, 2007AN Australian couple paid $40,000 to have controversial gender selection treatment in the US in order to have a baby girl.
'Wal-Martization' of Embryosby Osagie K. ObasogieBoston GlobeFebruary 1st, 2007Jenalee Ryan has Wal-Martized human reproduction: by buying preferred eggs and sperm wholesale, centralizing embryo production, and creating a business model that curbs inefficiencies in the assisted reproduction market, she hopes to undercut expensive fertility costs.
Important Changes in UK Law on Reproductive and Genetic Technologiesby David KingGenetic CrossroadsJanuary 26th, 2007Dr. David King gives his views on government proposals that would reorganize the UK HFEA and set important new rules.
Quality-controlled embryosby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesJanuary 22nd, 2007Last week's news about the "world's first embryo bank" brought much-needed attention to the accelerating marketization of baby-making.
Parents Want Genetic Test for Disease to Choose Baby's Genderby Lonny ShavelsonVoice of America NewsJanuary 17th, 2007"The quest to identify fetuses carrying potentially fatal genetic diseases got a powerful tool in the early 1990s, with the development of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis. PGD, as it's known, allows doctors to scan the cells of an embryo."
Many Clinics Use Genetic Diagnosis to Choose Sex [offsite]by Lonny ShavelsoAll Things ConsideredDecember 20th, 2006A survey found that 1 of every 11 PGD treatment was for sex-selection alone, and that 42% of clinics offering PGD offer it for sex selection.
Slippery When Wetby Osagie K. ObasogieBiopolitical TimesDecember 15th, 2006Between Iran’s Holocaust-questioning conference, the New York Times article on disabled parents designing babies with disabilities matching their own, and Armand Marie Leroi’s controversial article on eliminating fetuses with undesirable traits, eugenics seems to be the soup de jour on many people’s menus these days.
Wanting Babies Like Themselves, Some Parents Choose Genetic Defectsby Darshak M. Sanghavi, M.D.New York TimesDecember 5th, 2006"A coming article in the journal Fertility and Sterility offers a fascinating glimpse into how far some parents may go to ensure that their children stay in their world — by intentionally choosing malfunctioning genes that produce disabilities"
Opinion: Girl? Boy? And should we care?by Anita L. AllenPhiladelphia InquirerNovember 26th, 2006"Medically assisted sex selection raises ethical issues. It may be the first step on a slippery slope toward “designer babies.”"
Selecting children's sports with $100 gene-test swabs leaves playtime in the coldby Roy MacGregorGlobe and MailNovember 15th, 2006"But the one service that should send shivers up and down the spine of anyone who played a great many sports, even if badly, is the test to determine "human sports performance."
'Mortal Combat' and Biotechnologyby Parita ShahBiopolitical TimesNovember 14th, 2006Check out Will Saletan's latest article in Slate, Mortal Combat: The Exploding Politics of Biotechnology.
Survey of Fertility Clinics: Selection Technologies Widespread in the U.S.Genetic CrossroadsOctober 20th, 2006Half of U.S. fertility clinics that offer the embryo screening technique known as PGD say they allow couples to use it to choose the sex of their child, according to a survey recently released by the Genetics and Public Policy Center and published in the journal Fertility and Sterility.
Where Do Babies Come From?by Will SaletanWashington PostSeptember 17th, 2006"In its early days, PGD targeted fatal childhood diseases such as Tay-Sachs. But a new survey of U.S. fertility clinics, scheduled for release this week by the Genetics and Public Policy Center (GPPC), suggests that the line is moving."
The costly appliance of scienceby Peter SingerThe GuardianSeptember 14th, 2006"The advance of knowledge is often a mixed blessing. Over the past 60 years, nuclear physics has been one obvious example of this truth. Over the next 60 years, genetics may be another. "
Couples Cull Embryos to Halt Heritage of Cancerby Amy HarmonNew York TimesSeptember 3rd, 2006"Prospective parents have been using the procedure, known as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or P.G.D., for more than a decade to screen for genes certain to cause childhood diseases that are severe and largely untreatable."
PGD Frequently Asked QuestionsAnswers to common questions concerning pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
Wealthy foreign couples travel to U.S. to choose baby's sexby Carla K. JohnsonAssociated PressJune 15th, 2006"The Chinese want boys, and the Canadians want girls. If they have enough money, they come to the United States to choose the sex of their babies."
Cut-off GenesOur gentle descent toward eugenicsby William SaletanSlateMay 19th, 2006"The most important shift in the HFEA decision is that the lines being drawn in each of these areas_probability, treatability, and age of onset_are increasingly subjective."
Fertility body to allow embryo screening for cancerby Patricia ReaneyReuters UKMay 10th, 2006"The fertility watchdog decided on Wednesday to extend genetic screening of human embryos used in IVF treatments to check for faulty genes that increase the risk of breast, ovarian and bowel cancers."
A Wrongful Birth?by By Elizabeth WeilNew York Times MagazineMarch 12th, 2006"An unintended and particularly disconcerting consequence of all these new reproductive lawsuits is that they may bias the medical establishment toward termination, and some argue that such a bias already exists."
Scientists say human enhancement will shape competition of the futureby Paisley DoddsAssociated PressJanuary 26th, 2006"Memory enhancement, IQ boosters and drugs designed to attack genetic weaknesses may increase competition in the future and create a playing field that is far from equal, scientists at the World Economic Forum said. "
Opinion: Select one: a boy or a girl?by Ellen M. McGeeNewsdayJanuary 3rd, 2006"Humans always have cared about the gender of their offspring and over the centuries have used a variety of means, from herbal teas to infanticide, to attempt to get the boy or girl they wanted."
The Problem With an Almost-Perfect Genetic Worldby Amy HarmonNew York TimesNovember 20th, 2005An exploration of the implications of prenatal testing
Trial aims to measure social effects of choosing babies' sexNatureOctober 27th, 2005"US doctors have launched a clinical trial to assess the effects of allowing couples to select whether they will have a boy or a girl."
Congratulations, it's a Viking!Eugenics past and futureby Ralph BraveSacramento News & ReviewSeptember 29th, 2005Ralph Brave warns that "marketing enticements and procreative choices [are] luring today's parents-to-be. While some people warn against the dangers of a new 'consumer eugenics,' such ads make it clear we are already considerably down that road."
Roberts v. the Future: Genetic Screening and the Future of Personal AutonomyNew York TimesAugust 28th, 2005This excerpt examines how John Roberts may, as a US Supreme Court justice, rule on human reproductive cloning and sex selection.
Test-tube embryos may be screened for risk of cancer [UK]The TimesAugust 12th, 2005"The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) announced yesterday that it is to consult the public about letting couples choose embryos free from genetic defects. The defects raise the risk of cancer but do not always trigger it."
Boy or girl? You choose! [Israel]Jerusalem PostMay 18th, 2005A new committee in Israel will consider approving the use of PGD for sex selection for social reasons.
UN debates abortion of disabled foetusesby Irwin ArieffReutersFebruary 5th, 2005"U.N. diplomats drafting an international treaty on the rights of the disabled debated a possible ban on the abortion of foetuses with disabilities in an emotional negotiating session that ended on Friday."
Homo Respect-us: The creature genetic engineers fear most[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by William SaletanSlateDecember 17th, 2004Slate's William Saletan reports on a meeting to discuss the potential for human inheritable genetic modificiation, at which some scientists and ethicists "flirted" with moving forward, and mocked concerns.
Research cloning, PGD, and nuclear transfer in the United KingdomGenetic CrossroadsDecember 2nd, 2004Cloning pioneer Ian Wilmut heads the second lab to apply to the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for a license to conduct research cloning. The first such license was given to a team at Newcastle University lead by Alison Murdoch.
New Zealand LegislationGenetic CrossroadsDecember 2nd, 2004
Disability Community and Identity: Perceptions of Prenatal Screeningby Deborah Kaplan and Marsha SaxtonExcerpt from Our Bodies Ourselves (2005 edition)This article explores the social origins of disability discrimination and its implications for prenatal diagnosis, and examines some of the objections to screening expressed by people with disabilities.
Embryo screening 'devalues' disabled (New Zealand)by Rebecca PalmerStuff NZNovember 25th, 2004"Screening human embryos for serious genetic conditions could 'devalue' disabled children, the Office of the Children's Commissioner says."
Technology helps Indians choose baby's sexAustralian Broadcasting CompanyNovember 12th, 2004"The World Bioethics Congress in Sydney this week heard that despite laws limiting the use of prenatal and preconception technologies to diagnosing disease, such technologies were still being used to favour baby boys" in India.
'Designer babies' bill through after eight years (New Zealand)stuff.co.nzNovember 11th, 2004New Zealand's Human Assisted Reproductive Technology was strongly supported in its third reading. Its original author laments that it has been weakened during its years of debate, although she still supports the bill.
Critics attack landmark decision on gene screeningby Sarah BoseleyThe GuardianNovember 2nd, 2004"Not only the pressure group GeneWatch UK but even some fertility doctors had doubts about the way the decision was made [by the HFEA] to allow couples to have their embryos screened for a rare genetic mutation linked to bowel cancer."
Genetics: Deaf By Designby Carina DennisNatureOctober 20th, 2004"Employing genetic diagnosis to avoid having a baby with a disability is controversial enough. But a minority of deaf people would consider testing to ensure that they had a deaf child."
Views sought on guidelines for genetic testing of human embryos (New Zealand)Stuff (New Zealand)October 4th, 2004The National Ethics Committee on Assisted Human Reproduction has issued initial guidelines for PGD. A series of public consultations will provide input for the final version.
Couple devoted to baby made to save firstbornSydney Morning HeraldSeptember 26th, 2004An Australian couple who underwent PGD for tissue typing publicly defended their actions. They recently had a child matched to be a donor for their four year old son, who has the rare hyper IgM syndrome.
In Search of Baby Perfectby Patricia ReaneyToday onlineSeptember 25th, 2004Singaporean couples are traveling to Malaysia for PGD, including for tissue typing and sex selection. "There are no legal guidelines for PGD to be performed in Malaysia."
'Designer Baby' Gets Go-Ahead (UK)British legislation allows the use of embryos in stem cell therapy Deutsche WelleSeptember 10th, 2004Now that the UK HFEA has generally permitted PGD for tissue typing, a family who had asked for the change will move forward with the procedure for their son.
Italian minister in trouble after stem cell transplant announcementby Rossella LorenziThe ScientistSeptember 9th, 2004Calls for the resignation of Heath Minister Sirchia followed his praising of a stem cell transplant, while not mentioning that it prohibited in Italy under a new assisted reproduction law.
Rush for designer babiesby Nick PappsThe Sunday Mail (Australia)September 5th, 2004"Hundereds of Australian couples are avoiding the law and buying designer babies in the United States_. While Australian women are selling their eggs for up to $20,000 a 'harvest.'"
Babies at risk of being 'commodities', says Lord Winstonby Simon CollinsNew Zealand HeraldSeptember 2nd, 2004Lord Robert Winston, one of the chief pioneers of in vitro fertilization, expresses concern that PGD for tissue typing "raise[s] important questions about whether society might be at risk of allowing babies to be used as commodities."
Abbott seeks sex selection ban (Australia)by Suzanne SmithABC (Australia)August 30th, 2004Transcript of Australian TV program about using PGD for sex selection
Look who's perfect nowby Julie Robotham and Deborah SmithSydney Morning HeraldAugust 28th, 2004
GE babies banned - problems remain with HART bill (New Zealand)ScoopAugust 6th, 2004New Zealand's Green Party has reservations about the proposed regulatory structure for human genetic technologies.
Eugenics stir emotions in Germanyby John BohannonChristian Science MonitorJuly 22nd, 2004Discussion of any type of genetic engineering is particularly sensitive given the country's Nazi past.
'Designer baby' rules up for debate (UK)BBC NewsJuly 17th, 2004The UK's rules governing "designer babies" could soon be relaxed to allow more screening and embryo selection.
Boy or girl?The Lengths Some Couples Will Go To Select the Sex Of Their Child - And the Sticky Social Issues They’re Raising Along With the Babyby Beth WhitehouseNewsdayJuly 14th, 2004
CGS NEWSGenetic CrossroadsApril 9th, 2004
A Walk Down Memory Lane [PDF]An Insider's Reflections on the Campaign against Sex-Selective Abortionsby Manisha GupteJuly 31st, 2003
Test-Tube Babies and Designer Genesby Gina MarantoLos Angeles TimesJuly 25th, 2003
Fertility's New Frontierby Melissa HealyLos Angeles TimesJuly 21st, 2003
The New Eugenicsby Nicholas D. KristofNew York TimesJuly 4th, 2003One of the most profound and layered questions raised by recent genetic advances is this: Do we as a species still want babies born with genetic disabilities?
Ethical Issues in New Uses of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosisby Edgar DahlHuman ReproductionJune 1st, 2003In this brief article, German bioethicist Edgar Dahl raises and dismisses five objections to the future use of embryo screening to choose the sexual orientation of children. He does not mention any evidence for, or controversy about, a "gay gene," but concludes that if a "safe and reliable genetic test" for sexual orientation were to become available, "parents should clearly be allowed" to use it, as long as they are permitted to select for homosexual as well as heterosexual children. Dahl has previously argued that PGD should be allowed for sex selection for social reasons.
Watson's Worldby Susan LindeeScienceApril 18th, 2003
“Do We Want Science to Reinvent Human Aging?”by Bill McKibben and Gregory StockTranscript of live debateMarch 27th, 2003
Letter to HFEA on Sex Selection by Tania Simoncelli and Marcy DarnovskyJanuary 22nd, 2003
The case against sex selection [PDF]Human Genetics Alert
Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible? [PDF]by Adrienne AschFlorida State University Law ReviewNovember 30th, 2002"Is it possible for the same society to espouse the goals of including people with disabilities as fully equal and participating members and simultaneously promoting the use of embryo selection and selective abortion to prevent the births of those who would live with disabilities? As currently practiced and justified, prenatal testing and embryo selection cannot comfortably coexist with society’s professed goals of promoting inclusion and equality for people with disabilities. Nonetheless, revamped clinical practice and social policy could permit informed reproductive choice and respect for current and future people with disabilities."
Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis and Selection: From Disease Prevention to Customized Conception [PDF]by Tania SimoncelliDifferent TakesNovember 30th, 2002
SUPPORT FOR BANS ON HUMAN GENETIC MODIFICATIONGenetic CrossroadsNovember 26th, 2002
A Less Valued Life [PDF]Population Policy and Sex Selection in Indiaby Rupsa MallikSeptember 30th, 2002
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in the NewsGenetic CrossroadsAugust 12th, 2002
Ensuring Your Baby Will Be Healthy:Embryo Screening Test Gains in Popularity and Controversy; Choosing a Child's Genderby Amy Dockser MarcusThe Wall Street JournalJuly 25th, 2002
A Girl or Boy, You Pickby Aaron Zitner The Los Angeles TimesJuly 23rd, 2002Embryo sorting makes it possible to screen for gender and diseases. But the embryos no one wants raise profound ethical questions.
World Watch Magazine Special Issue: "Beyond Cloning: The Risk of Rushing into Human Genetic Engineering"Genetic CrossroadsJuly 11th, 2002
The New Eugenicsby Michael DorseyWorld WatchJune 30th, 2002
Genetic Selection Arguments Pro and ConShort summary of the arguments for and against pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
Jack or Jill? The Era of Consumer-Driven Eugenics Has Begunby Margaret TalbotThe Atlantic MonthlyFebruary 28th, 2002
Open Letter on Sex Selection to Fertility Industry Trade Group January 18th, 2002
Human Cloning Advocate Pushes Fertility Clinics to OK Sex SelectionGenetic CrossroadsOctober 3rd, 2001
A Real "Brave New World"What Human Genetic Engineers Plan for Your Futureby Mark Gabrish ConlanZenger's NewsmagazineJune 27th, 2001Opponents of human genetic engineering spoke forcefully at a workshop at San Diego City College June 24 as part of the Biojustice/Beyond Biodevastation V event.
NOT A DESIGNER BABY: Embryo Selection Provides Tissue Match for Sick SisterGenetic CrossroadsOctober 16th, 2000
Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic TestingGenetic CrossroadsSeptember 19th, 2000A 22-page report titled "The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections and Recommendations," has been published by the Hastings Center.
The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing [PDF]Reflections and Recommendationsby Erik Parens and Adrienne AschHastings Center Report
Interview with Richard Hayes by Casey WalkerHuman Genetic Engineeringby Casey WalkerWild Duck ReviewMay 31st, 1999
Human germline gene modification: a dissent. (Viewpoint)by Paul R Billings; Ruth Hubbard; Stuart A. NewmanThe LancetMay 29th, 1999
Designer Babiesby Michael D. LemonickTimeJanuary 11th, 1999
Designer Babiesby Sharon BegleyNewsweekNovember 9th, 1998
SuperhumansLike it or not, in a few short years we'll have the power to control our own evolutionby Robert Taylor New ScientistOctober 1st, 1998
Problems of Germline Therapyby Anne McLaren and Jonathan EwbankNatureApril 16th, 1998

ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.625.0819 • (F) 1.510.665.8760