 |
| The Great Gene Hunt (cont'd)by Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesSeptember 3rd, 2010Accurate reporting and headlines should not be noteworthy, but when it comes to genetics they are -- and Reuters got one right. |
| Sometimes Beautiful People Do Unattractive Thingsby Osagie Obasogie , Biopolitical TimesJune 23rd, 2010Beautifulpeople.com is taking the designer gamete market to a whole new level by using its online dating service as a vehicle for people to find sperm from attractive donors so that they can presumably have beautiful children. |
| Caveat Emptor, Caveat Spittor by Marcy Darnovsky, Biopolitical TimesMay 14th, 2010Direct-to-consumer genetic tests are bad medicine. And what of their societal implications? |
| A Real-Life Version of “My Sister’s Keeper”by Marcy Darnovsky, Biopolitical TimesMay 6th, 2010"The Match" is an emotionally compelling and thought-provoking account of a family's decision to create a genetically matched baby to treat their sick daughter. |
| 3-Parent Embryos Could Prevent Disease, But Raise Ethical Issues
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Brandon Keim, Wired ScienceApril 14th, 2010Mitochondrial swapping might seem less controversial than regular genetic engineering, because it involves metabolism rather than obvious physical traits. "On the other hand, when embryo manipulations for heritable changes start being done, even with the best intentions, we're on slippery ground," said Darnovsky. |
| Whither Personal Genomics?by Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesJanuary 29th, 2010Three companies offer contrasting examples of where the fledgling industry goes from here. |
| Nudging the Discourse?by Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesJanuary 8th, 2010The Popular Mechanics article misleadingly titled "How to Create a Designer Baby" includes a call for regulation of assisted reproduction. |
| GATTACA Comes to Baseballby Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesJuly 24th, 2009Major League Baseball has been using DNA tests on prospects from the Dominican Republic. |
| Other uses for laboratory-produced sperm?by Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesJuly 13th, 2009Advances in laboratory-produced sperm--if perfected--could also be used for other purposes, including troubling ones. |
| Eugenics and Genetic Screeningby Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesMay 20th, 2009A new report raises the specter of eugenics from a libertarian perspective. |
| Answering Questions With Questionsby Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesApril 23rd, 2009The future of genomics is now the subject of serious debate, with enormous implications for genomic medicine. |
| Parents 'refused genetic tests'by Clare Murphy, BBC NewsApril 22nd, 2009Children are being born with severe genetic abnormalities because their parents are being refused funding to screen their embryos, those working in the field have claimed. |
| Voluntary isn't workingRecent events show need for regulation of assisted reproductionby Marcy Darnovsky, Modern HealthcareApril 13th, 2009Responsible regulation and oversight will protect fertility patients and bolster public trust in the enterprise of assisted reproduction. |
| 23andMe Targets Mommies-to-Beby Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesApril 1st, 2009The personal genomics company's new target is pregnant women. Are early-stage fetuses next? |
| Designer Babies [MP3 audio][Features CGS's Osagie Obasogie]by Michael Krasny, KQED ForumMarch 10th, 2009Is there a legal and ethical infrastructure in place to govern 'designer babies'? |
| Forget Designer Baby Bags—Now There’s Designer Babies[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Madeline Ellis, Health NewsMarch 4th, 2009Questions of the limits of reproductive technology were raised after the a fertility clinic announced plans to allow prospective parents to choose the gender, eye, hair, skin color, and other physical traits of their babies. |
| Custom order babies [Video][Features CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]CNN Headline NewsMarch 3rd, 2009The news network interviews CGS's associate executive director regarding a fertility clinic's offer to select for a baby's cosmetic traits. |
| "Racial alchemy" - for real?by Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesFebruary 26th, 2009Until now, hypothetical discussions of embryo screening for eye and skin color have seemed distant. |
| Fetal DNA Test Sheds Light, But Stirs an Ethical Battleby Todd Ackerman, Houston ChronicleDecember 21st, 2008Baylor College of Medicine is at the forefront of new DNA testing that screens fetuses for hundreds of genetic abnormalities — testing touted for diagnosing previously undetectable disorders but sparking debate because it's sure to result in more abortions. |
| Known Unknownsby Pete Shanks, Biopolitical TimesDecember 2nd, 2008As more anomalies are reported, it seems that we know less and less about more and more -- and scientifically, this is a good thing. |
| Picking the Best Babyby Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesDecember 2nd, 2008With the price of genetic sequencing plummeting, technologies enabling prospective parents and clinicians to pick the genetically "best" potential child may become feasible. |
| Gene testing of embryos needs guidingExperts caution against use of tests for adult-onset disordersby Erika Check Hayden, NatureNovember 19th, 2008The prospect of using the technologies sold by personal-genomics companies to choose the genetic make-up of their children raises controversy |
| Last Second Shotby Osagie Obasogie, Biopolitical TimesNovember 17th, 2008ESPN recently ran a web feature story and televised segment (see below) on NBA All- Star forward Carlos Boozer and his son’s struggle with sickle cell anemia. |
| Designer babies: Creating the perfect child[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by Mike Steere, CNNOctober 30th, 2008The Center for Genetics and Society is trying to encourage debate on the topic of genetic selection as soon as possible. Executive director of the organization, Richard Hayes, told CNN that in most countries, the public is missing out on taking part in the debate. |
| The Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act [PDF]October 16th, 2008The Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act, co-sponsored by Senators Kennedy and Brownback and signed into law in October 2008, is a positive step toward providing better information and support to pregnant women and new mothers whose fetus or newborn is diagnosed with a disability. This information sheet highlights the Act’s benefits and identifies some of the issues to monitor in its implementation. |
| Kiwis consider sex selectionby Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesJune 20th, 2008The New Zealand Bioethics Council recommended allowing prospective parents to use sex selection through PGD for family balancing. |
| Is Sex Necessary for Reproduction?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Bernadette Tansey, San Francisco ChronicleJune 1st, 2008The in vitro fertilization industry, which originated in the 1980s as a solution for infertile couples, has actively sought to expand its market scope by tapping social trends and collaborating with researchers in genetics and stem cell technology. |
| Dutch Cabinet Crisis Averted... For NowJust a storm in a test tube?by RNW's Dutch service, Radio Netherlands WorldwideMay 31st, 2008Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende's fourth cabinet has narrowly avoided its first internal crisis caused by the domestic practice of carrying out tests for certain genetic defects on embryos during IVF treatment. |
| MPs Reject 'Saviour Sibling' BanBBC NewsMay 23rd, 2008A bid to stop parents having "saviour siblings" - babies selected to provide genetic material for seriously ill relatives - has been defeated by the United Kingdom Parliament.
|
| Robert Winston on the UK's fertility billby Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesMay 13th, 2008Assisted reproduction pioneer Lord Robert Winston had some surprising words about the UK's controversial bill to overhaul its oversight of the reproduction industry and stem cell research. |
| Sex selection: On sale hereby Marcy Darnovsky, Biopolitical TimesApril 24th, 2008A discount offer - on an ethically sketchy and unnecessary invasive procedure. |
| Couples Could Win Right to Select Deaf Babyby Richard Gray, TelegraphApril 14th, 2008Deaf couples could be allowed to use embryo-screening technology and choose to have a deaf child, after an amendment to a controversial bill to overhaul the UK's oversight of ARTs. |
| Is it wrong to select a deaf embryo?by Clare Murphy, BBC NewsMarch 10th, 2008New fertility legislation will make it illegal to use embryos with a known genetic abnormality in IVF treatment when ones without the same defect are available. |
| Deaf demand right to designer deaf childrenby Sarah-Kate Templeton, The Times (UK)December 23rd, 2007Deaf parents should be allowed to screen their embryos so they can pick a deaf child over one that has all its senses intact, according to the chief executive of the Royal National Institute for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. |
| Watson as wake-up call: When genetics endorses a new eugenicsby Marcy Darnovsky, Biopolitical TimesOctober 22nd, 2007Though neither media nor blogosphere have noted it so far, Watson and a small but disturbing number of other prominent figures are actively promoting a renewed program of eugenics - this time using 21st-century reproductive and genetic technologies. |
| Birth Without the Bother?by Nicholas D. Kristof, New York TimesJuly 23rd, 2007"So where do we regulate and draw the line? My vote is to allow genetic technologies aimed at combating disease or infertility, but to bar any effort that goes beyond the curative to enhance the germ line DNA of our offspring." |
| Genetic Disorderby Dana Goldstein, In These TimesJuly 6th, 2007National health policy has not kept up with genetic science, and many Americans lack the information they need to make an informed decision about whether to carry a pregnancy to term. |
| Genetic Testing + Abortion = ???by Amy Harmon, New York TimesMay 13th, 2007As prenatal tests make it possible to identify fetuses that will have mental retardation, deafness, and a range of other conditions, such personal deliberations are adding a new layer to the fraught political debate over abortion. |
| UK's HFEA Lowers the Bar, Againby Jesse Reynolds, Biopolitical TimesApril 30th, 2007The Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority - Britain's regulatory body for reproductive and genetic technologies - has just given the green light for IVF embryos to be screened for the "breast cancer genes." But besides this lowering of the bar in expanding PGD's use, this also highlights two roles played by government in promoting what some call a "new eugenics." |
| Choosing Babiesby Emily Singer, MIT Technology ReviewMarch 13th, 2007A growing number of genetic tests can be performed during in vitro fertilization, before pregnancy even begins. Is that a good thing? |
| 'Wal-Martization' of Embryosby Osagie K. Obasogie, Boston GlobeFebruary 1st, 2007Jenalee Ryan has Wal-Martized human reproduction: by buying preferred eggs and sperm wholesale, centralizing embryo production, and creating a business model that curbs inefficiencies in the assisted reproduction market, she hopes to undercut expensive fertility costs. |
| Quality-controlled embryosby Marcy Darnovsky, Biopolitical TimesJanuary 22nd, 2007Last week's news about the "world's first embryo bank" brought much-needed attention to the accelerating marketization of baby-making. |
| Slippery When Wetby Osagie K. Obasogie, Biopolitical TimesDecember 15th, 2006Between Iran’s Holocaust-questioning conference, the New York Times article on disabled parents designing babies with disabilities matching their own, and Armand Marie Leroi’s controversial article on eliminating fetuses with undesirable traits, eugenics seems to be the soup de jour on many people’s menus these days. |
| 'Mortal Combat' and Biotechnologyby Parita Shah, Biopolitical TimesNovember 14th, 2006Check out Will Saletan's latest article in Slate, Mortal Combat: The Exploding Politics of Biotechnology. |
| Survey of Fertility Clinics: Selection Technologies Widespread in the U.S.Genetic CrossroadsOctober 20th, 2006Half of U.S. fertility clinics that offer the embryo screening technique known as PGD say they allow couples to use it to choose the sex of their child, according to a survey recently released by the Genetics and Public Policy Center and published in the journal Fertility and Sterility. |
| Where Do Babies Come From?by Will Saletan, Washington PostSeptember 17th, 2006"In its early days, PGD targeted fatal childhood diseases such as Tay-Sachs. But a new survey of U.S. fertility clinics, scheduled for release this week by the Genetics and Public Policy Center (GPPC), suggests that the line is moving." |
| The costly appliance of scienceby Peter Singer, The GuardianSeptember 14th, 2006"The advance of knowledge is often a mixed blessing. Over the past 60 years, nuclear physics has been one obvious example of this truth. Over the next 60 years, genetics may be another. " |
| Couples Cull Embryos to Halt Heritage of Cancerby Amy Harmon, New York TimesSeptember 3rd, 2006"Prospective parents have been using the procedure, known as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or P.G.D., for more than a decade to screen for genes certain to cause childhood diseases that are severe and largely untreatable." |
| Cut-off GenesOur gentle descent toward eugenicsby William Saletan, SlateMay 19th, 2006"The most important shift in the HFEA decision is that the lines being drawn in each of these areas_probability, treatability, and age of onset_are increasingly subjective." |
| A Wrongful Birth?by By Elizabeth Weil, New York Times MagazineMarch 12th, 2006"An unintended and particularly disconcerting consequence of all these new reproductive lawsuits is that they may bias the medical establishment toward termination, and some argue that such a bias already exists." |
| Opinion: Select one: a boy or a girl?by Ellen M. McGee, NewsdayJanuary 3rd, 2006"Humans always have cared about the gender of their offspring and over the centuries have used a variety of means, from herbal teas to infanticide, to attempt to get the boy or girl they wanted." |
| Congratulations, it's a Viking!Eugenics past and futureby Ralph Brave, Sacramento News & ReviewSeptember 29th, 2005Ralph Brave warns that "marketing enticements and procreative choices [are] luring today's parents-to-be. While some people warn against the dangers of a new 'consumer eugenics,' such ads make it clear we are already considerably down that road." |
| UN debates abortion of disabled foetusesby Irwin Arieff, ReutersFebruary 5th, 2005"U.N. diplomats drafting an international treaty on the rights of the disabled debated a possible ban on the abortion of foetuses with disabilities in an emotional negotiating session that ended on Friday." |
| Homo Respect-us: The creature genetic engineers fear most[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by William Saletan, SlateDecember 17th, 2004Slate's William Saletan reports on a meeting to discuss the potential for human inheritable genetic modificiation, at which some scientists and ethicists "flirted" with moving forward, and mocked concerns. |
| Research cloning, PGD, and nuclear transfer in the United KingdomGenetic CrossroadsDecember 2nd, 2004Cloning pioneer Ian Wilmut heads the second lab to apply to the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for a license to conduct research cloning. The first such license was given to a team at Newcastle University lead by Alison Murdoch. |
| Critics attack landmark decision on gene screeningby Sarah Boseley, The GuardianNovember 2nd, 2004"Not only the pressure group GeneWatch UK but even some fertility doctors had doubts about the way the decision was made [by the HFEA] to allow couples to have their embryos screened for a rare genetic mutation linked to bowel cancer." |
| Genetics: Deaf By Designby Carina Dennis, NatureOctober 20th, 2004"Employing genetic diagnosis to avoid having a baby with a disability is controversial enough. But a minority of deaf people would consider testing to ensure that they had a deaf child." |
| In Search of Baby Perfectby Patricia Reaney, Today onlineSeptember 25th, 2004Singaporean couples are traveling to Malaysia for PGD, including for tissue typing and sex selection. "There are no legal guidelines for PGD to be performed in Malaysia." |
| 'Designer Baby' Gets Go-Ahead (UK)British legislation allows the use of embryos in stem cell therapy Deutsche WelleSeptember 10th, 2004Now that the UK HFEA has generally permitted PGD for tissue typing, a family who had asked for the change will move forward with the procedure for their son. |
| Rush for designer babiesby Nick Papps, The Sunday Mail (Australia)September 5th, 2004"Hundereds of Australian couples are avoiding the law and buying designer babies in the United States_. While Australian women are selling their eggs for up to $20,000 a 'harvest.'" |
| Boy or girl?The Lengths Some Couples Will Go To Select the Sex Of Their Child - And the Sticky Social Issues They’re Raising Along With the Babyby Beth Whitehouse, NewsdayJuly 14th, 2004 |
| CGS NEWSGenetic CrossroadsApril 9th, 2004 |
| The New Eugenicsby Nicholas D. Kristof, New York TimesJuly 4th, 2003One of the most profound and layered questions raised by recent genetic advances is this: Do we as a species still want babies born with genetic disabilities? |
| Ethical Issues in New Uses of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosisby Edgar Dahl, Human ReproductionJune 1st, 2003In this brief article, German bioethicist Edgar Dahl raises and dismisses five objections to the future use of embryo screening to choose the sexual orientation of children. He does not mention any evidence for, or controversy about, a "gay gene," but concludes that if a "safe and reliable genetic test" for sexual orientation were to become available, "parents should clearly be allowed" to use it, as long as they are permitted to select for homosexual as well as heterosexual children. Dahl has previously argued that PGD should be allowed for sex selection for social reasons. |
| Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible? [PDF]by Adrienne Asch, Florida State University Law ReviewNovember 30th, 2002"Is it possible for the same society to espouse the goals of including people with disabilities as fully equal and participating members and simultaneously promoting the use of embryo selection and selective abortion to prevent the births of those who would live with disabilities? As currently practiced and justified, prenatal testing and embryo selection cannot comfortably coexist with society’s professed goals of promoting inclusion and equality for people with disabilities. Nonetheless, revamped clinical practice and social policy could permit informed reproductive choice and respect for current and future people with disabilities." |
| Ensuring Your Baby Will Be Healthy:Embryo Screening Test Gains in Popularity and Controversy; Choosing a Child's Genderby Amy Dockser Marcus, The Wall Street JournalJuly 25th, 2002 |
| A Girl or Boy, You Pickby Aaron Zitner, The Los Angeles TimesJuly 23rd, 2002Embryo sorting makes it possible to screen for gender and diseases. But the embryos no one wants raise profound ethical questions. |
| A Real "Brave New World"What Human Genetic Engineers Plan for Your Futureby Mark Gabrish Conlan, Zenger's NewsmagazineJune 27th, 2001Opponents of human genetic engineering spoke forcefully at a workshop at San Diego City College June 24 as part of the Biojustice/Beyond Biodevastation V event. |
| SuperhumansLike it or not, in a few short years we'll have the power to control our own evolutionby Robert Taylor, New ScientistOctober 1st, 1998 |
|
|
 |