|  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Editorial: Cellular mutationSacramento BeeJune 2nd, 2006"In her latest effort to reform California's $3 billion stem cell research institute, state Sen. Deborah Ortiz, D-Sacramento, has introduced SB 401, a proposed ballot measure that seeks to close gaps in Proposition 71..." |
| Cloning Scientist Is Indicted in South Koreaby CHOE SANG-HUN, New York TimesMay 12th, 2006" Hwang Woo Suk, the disgraced cloning expert, was indicted on fraud and embezzlement charges today, months after an investigative panel determined that he had fabricated evidence to prove that he had cloned human cells. " |
| Stem-cell Research Blasted from New Angle[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Michelle Chen, The New StandardMay 8th, 2006"Groups that support stem-cell research are warning that the state_s massive research-funding plan is not immune to narrow interest groups that could undermine the potential public-health benefits." |
| Lax oversight by Pitt enabled Schatten fiascoby By Jennifer Bails and Luis Fabregas, Pittsburgh Tribune-ReviewApril 23rd, 2006"The University of Pittsburgh's lax policies and disregard for federal guidelines allowed biologist Gerald Schatten to participate in one of the biggest scientific frauds in history, according to a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review examination. " |
| A booming baby businessby Evan Pondel, LA Daily NewsApril 23rd, 2006"The assisted reproductive industry is entirely unregulated. And self-regulation from these companies is inadequate," said Reynolds, director of the project on biotechnology accountability. |
| Editorial: For $10,000, you get ...Sacramento BeeApril 16th, 2006"Frustrated by lawsuits that have held up funding for California's $3 billion stem cell research institute, some of San Francisco's most prominent philanthropists are holding a gala fundraiser for this state agency on May 22." |
| Opinion: The legal lock on stem cellsby Jennifer Washburn, Los Angeles TimesApril 12th, 2006"CALIFORNIA'S $3-billion stem cell program has encountered repeated setbacks since it was approved by voters 17 months ago. Now it faces an entirely new and potentially even more worrisome challenge arising from two powerful patents..." |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
Highlighted Topics
