Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About Bioethics & Human Biotechnology


Bioethics established itself in the late 1960s as a field concerned with the ethical and philosophical implications of certain biological and medical procedures, technologies, and treatments. Early issues included end-of-life decision-making, organ donation, and human experimentation. Human biotechnology became a concern when the first bioethics institutes were established in the early 1970s. This attention skyrocketed in 1990 when the U.S. Human Genome Project earmarked 3% to 5% of its $3 billion federal budget to the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) research program, making its activities the world's largest bioethics program.

Bioethics initially represented diverse ethical philosophies. But by the mid-1980s, most professional bioethicists were grounded in individualist and utilitarian frameworks. Bioethicists appropriately continued to consider informed consent, patient safety and similar topics, but their attention to the broad social and political meanings of human biotechnologies had faded.

This shift has been unfortunate for the public's understanding. Most bioethicists present themselves as disinterested analysts who can be trusted to represent a full range of constituencies: researchers, biotech corporations, patients, religious groups, marginalized communities, and other affected parties. But in fact, many promote their own world views, which often emphasize libertarian values over commitments to the public interest.

The role of bioethics has been further compromised by its increasing financial and professional ties to the biotech industry. Many university bioethics centers receive funding from biotech corporations, and many bioethicists serve as paid or unpaid members of corporate "ethical advisory boards."



Research Ethics at Minnesotaby Osagie Obasogie Biopolitical TimesAugust 31st, 2010When is it ethical to enroll human subjects in what are essentially marketing campaigns? Or, as Elliott asks, “How much of a risk to human subjects is justified in a study whose aim is to ‘generate commercially attractive messages?’”
Exposing the Student Bodyby Ferris JabrScientific AmericanJuly 6th, 2010Heated debate surrounds the ethics of universities' decisions to analyze student DNA.
Incentives for Donation of Human Bodily Material?by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMay 10th, 2010The Nuffield Council on Bioethics has launched a public consultation about donating, or perhaps selling, human bodily material.
Fiction in Scienceby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMay 7th, 2010The journal Science cheapens its coverage of an important paper by including speculation, which it refutes, about the cloning of Neanderthals.
A Real-Life Version of “My Sister’s Keeper”by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 6th, 2010"The Match" is an emotionally compelling and thought-provoking account of a family's decision to create a genetically matched baby to treat their sick daughter.
When Cultures Collideby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesApril 28th, 2010The lawsuit brought by 41 members of the Havasupai Indian tribe against Arizona State University has implications that go far beyond last week's settlement.
'Informed Consent' and the Ethics of DNA Researchby Amy HarmonNew York Times April 23rd, 2010Havasupai Indians won a lawsuit over the use of their blood for genetic research, revealing deep cultural differences between scientists and research subjects.
Havasupai Case Highlights Risks in DNA Researchby Amy HarmonNew York Times April 21st, 2010Informed consent is at the heart of a case involving the DNA of Havasupai Indians.
British group weighs paying organ donorsAssociated PressApril 19th, 2010An influential British medical think tank is tackling the question of how far society should go to boost the number of organ and tissue donors, and is weighing a proposal to pay for body parts.
Against the Grain: Progressive Bioethics[Interview with CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by C.S. SoongAgainst the Grain, KPFA RadioApril 19th, 2010The emergence or specter of biotechnologies like assisted reproduction and human cloning has raised thorny ethical issues. According to Marcy Darnovsky, progressives and radicals have not always approached these issues carefully and thoughtfully. Darnovsky talks about designer babies, surrogacy, stem cell research, and much more.
Displaying 1-10 of 157  
Next >> 
Last Page » 
« Show Complete List » 


ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.625.0819 • (F) 1.510.665.8760